ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0410

Usefulness of RAPID3 in Assessing Unmet Needs of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission or with Low Disease Activity -a Multicenter Observational Study: T-FLAG Study-

Mochihito Suzuki1, Nobunori Takahashi2, Yasumori Sobue3, yoshifumi Ohashi1, Ryo Sato1, Masataka Maeda1, Hironobu Kosugiyama1, yusuke Ohno1, kenya terabe4, Shuji Asai1 and Shiro Imagama1, 1Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan, 3Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, 4Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disease Activity, Patient reported outcomes, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0380–0422) RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that can be used to assess the condition of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients using only a questionnaire that can be completed in a short time. In previous reports, RAPID3 could be used as an assessment similar to Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), a common disease activity assessment [1]. However, there are unmet needs in which patients have low satisfaction with treatment, even though they are in remission according to disease activity assessments such as DAS28. To investigate the cause of this discrepancy, we decided to conduct a study using RAPID3 as a subjective patient assessment. The aime of this study was to investigate the discrepancy between disease activity and RAPID3 in RA patients.

Methods: The data for this study were obtained from the Tsurumai-Frailty and Locomotive Syndrome of Rheumatoid Arthritis for Globalization (T-FLAG), an observational study involving three centers. Of the 638 RA patients who completed the PRO questionnaire in 2022, 455 patients with a DAS28-CRP of low disease activity (LDA) or remission (REM) were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed using the RAPID3, DAS28-CRP. PRO assessment was performed using PtGA, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Kihon checklist (KCL), and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25). RAPID3 categories were compared in two groups: REM/LDA, and medium and high disease activity (MDA/HDA). Cutoff values for each PRO were detected using ROC analysis.

Results: The mean age (± standard deviation) was 69±14, female was 72%, disease duration was 12±9, RAPID3 was 3.1±4.0, DAS28-CRP was 1.65±0.48, HAQ-DI was 0.31±0.55, and KCL was 6.1±4.4. In the disease activity category, 84.5% of patients had RAPID3 and DAS28-CRP in the same category (The disease activity category of RAPID3 was LDA or REM). There were no significant differences in gender, biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, C-reactive protein, tender joint count, swollen joint count between the two groups of REM/LDA and MDA/HAD (Table 1). On the other hand, there were significant differences between the two groups in disease duration (11 vs. 16 years), PtGA (5 vs. 39mm), HAQ-DI (0.20 vs. 0.96), KCL (5.5 vs. 9.7), and GLFS-25 (13 vs. 32). The cutoff values for PRO assessment for different disease activity categories of patients were HAQ-DI 0.375 points, KCL 8 points, and GLFS-25 16 points.

Conclusion: In this study of patients with good disease activity control, 84.5% of patients were found to have a concordance between RAPID3 and DAS28 disease activity categories. The discrepancy between DAS28-CRP and RAPID3 may be due to physical dysfunction (HAQ-DI or GLFS-25) or frailty (KCL). Therefore, it is important to achieve clinical remission and improve PRO in RA treatment as an intervention to address unmet needs.

Supporting image 1

Baseline characteristic of patients by RAPID3 category


Disclosures: M. Suzuki: None; N. Takahashi: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Asahi-Kasei, 6, Astellas, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Chugai, 6, Daiichi Sankyo, 6, Eisai, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Sanofi, 6, UCB, 6; Y. Sobue: None; y. Ohashi: None; R. Sato: None; M. Maeda: None; H. Kosugiyama: None; y. Ohno: None; k. terabe: None; S. Asai: None; S. Imagama: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Suzuki M, Takahashi N, Sobue Y, Ohashi y, Sato R, Maeda M, Kosugiyama H, Ohno y, terabe k, Asai S, Imagama S. Usefulness of RAPID3 in Assessing Unmet Needs of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission or with Low Disease Activity -a Multicenter Observational Study: T-FLAG Study- [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/usefulness-of-rapid3-in-assessing-unmet-needs-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-remission-or-with-low-disease-activity%e3%80%80-a-multicenter-observational-study-t-flag-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/usefulness-of-rapid3-in-assessing-unmet-needs-of-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-remission-or-with-low-disease-activity%e3%80%80-a-multicenter-observational-study-t-flag-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology